Okay let me spell it out clearly for people who can’t make reasonable inferences: THE WHITE HOUSE DID NOT CALL HIM.
So you believe in Olbermann’s theory of Beck as Lonesome Rhodes?
OK, Dan....what will you bet??
Just like a liberal...start with the insults when the supply of logic zeroes out.
It is your OPINION that the White House didn't call him, but your opinion is not one iota more convincing than Gore's opinion on global warming.
You present it as fact, without any evidence. If this were a court room maybe you could claim to be an expert witness and your opinion would have some weight to it, but that is not the case. You spouted off about Beck based on zero evidence.
My question is: Why should I believe you over Glenn Beck?