[domenad]

I’m saying I don’t believe him. I don’t need any evidence, and I don’t need to prove it. He says he talked to the White House, it’s on HIM to prove it, not me. We’ll see soon enough if I’m wrong, but his announcement has all the trappings of a “teaser” to get you to watch the next day.

[behzinlea]

Of COURSE it's a teaser. It's only smart business to defer it to the next day to generate greater interest and draw a larger audience.

But the fact that it's packaged as a teaser sure as hell doesn't mean it's false.

[GOP_Resurrected]

Look, I’m not a Beck sycophant, I think he can be hyperbolic bordering on silly sometimes. But why is it so implausible that this White House would have some communications lackey call him to COMPLAIN? They devote full time employees and websites there to monitor and respond to critics.

[driftdiver]

You stated it as fact, not as opinion.

“We’ll see soon enough if I’m wrong, but his announcement has all the trappings of a “teaser” to get you to watch the next day.”

Do you have ANY idea what Beck does for a living?

[JustaDumbBlonde]

pinging myself to this post to revisit after Thursday's GB show.

[Dionysius]

I’m giving the benefit of the doubt to Beck — the White House has repeately shown that it is unworthy of said benefit. (Except to O’Reilly. He’ll continue to pander to Obama up until they shut off his microphone and haul him away).