Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/16/2009 4:27:55 PM PST by FreeManDC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: FreeManDC

Does Mr. Collins know that Tiger Woods is famous while the women, up until now, aren’t?


2 posted on 12/16/2009 4:35:12 PM PST by skr (May God confound the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FreeManDC
There was once a guy who had a talking dog. One morning he gave the dog a $20 bill and told him to go down to the corner store and buy a newspaper. The dog took the money and scampered away.

An hour passed; then two hours, and the guy started getting worried. He got dressed and walked a block down the road. At the end of the street, what should he see but his priceless dog, humping a female poodle.

"Spot!" he cried, amazed. "You've never done this before!"

"Yeah," replied the dog, "and I've never had money!

3 posted on 12/16/2009 4:35:56 PM PST by Mr Ramsbotham (Obey the law, or you'll go to prison and be raped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FreeManDC

Well, let me be the first to point out that on FR the sluts don’t get a pass. They are female sexual opportunists, predators, & facilitators and clearly have no concern for the welfare of the young children *fathered* by their sexual target(s).

If these self-absorbed females ever have the good fortune to find a husband, let us hope they never, ever become mothers to a new generation of walking wounded.


4 posted on 12/16/2009 4:38:12 PM PST by sodpoodle (Stop wasting our wealth and start telling the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FreeManDC

What a sad article. Tiger Woods is famous. Tiger Woods is a role model. People held Tiger Woods up as an example.

Who cares about the slime he slept with? Why even care about golf? He has a wife and children. People make mistakes and they should be forgiven for them, but Tiger had a methodology for violating his wedding vows. He had a SYSTEM.


5 posted on 12/16/2009 4:41:12 PM PST by HospiceNurse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FreeManDC

It does take two to tango. While Tigers image had been carefully crafted, these ‘’ladies’’ were hardly the blushing violets. The person hurt in the end is Mrs. Tiger Woods.


7 posted on 12/16/2009 4:55:11 PM PST by John-Irish ("Shame of him who thinks of it''.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FreeManDC

There is definitely a double standard. Before feminism changed our society, the double standard was that women were to be virgins and men were not expected to be. Since feminism became popular, neither men nor women are expected to be virgins. Sexual intercourse today is what shaking hands was fifty years ago. It is little more than a greeting. It would be rude not to have sexual intercourse with someone you liked. These women were following the cultural norm, and if you can make a few bucks, why not? Let’s be honest here. We are not dealing with virtuous people, nither Tiger nor the women. They are all bottom feeders when it comes to character. I have no sympathy for any of them.


10 posted on 12/16/2009 5:15:23 PM PST by Nosterrex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FreeManDC

Tiger is a dirtbag. He is a mental case.


11 posted on 12/16/2009 5:16:50 PM PST by GinaLolaB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FreeManDC

“Tired of hearing about Tiger Woods...?”

Yes I am. I’d much rather hear about how many kids died from swine flu this week. What happened with that?


13 posted on 12/16/2009 5:50:07 PM PST by mikey_hates_everything
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FreeManDC
Ergo, they are not equals to Woods. They are merely women, subject to his desires. They are not capable of sin on their own! Oh? They do not compete is his moral class? His immorality is a far superior playing field than theirs? Let's hope St. Peter sees it that way, ushers them past the pearlies while eyeing that fellow down the line in a T-shirt carrying a five-iron.

Finally an article on this topic that I can I agree with.  In this sordid scandal, the one who gets the blame over and over again for any allegation is Tiger.  The media depicts Tiger as the monster in this ordeal with their endless gossip and allegations; however, they don't say a word about the easy tramp females who bed him and turn around to share their story for a payday.

I noticed that these women get an easy pass from the media and from most readers, yet they are the ones who make their sex so easily available to men like Tiger, and who embarrass women with values and principles.

Our culture has reached the point where guys in bars (and just about any other place) pick up women and go to bed with them without any trouble.  Many women are so easily disposed to such activities that they make the minority of women who don't accept such invitations look like a tight ass (no pun intended).

So I find it totally hypocritical seeing all those females commentators (who may have earned their big break on the casting couch) and their guests pontificating on TV. This is not to excuse Tiger, he is at fault just like those women are, and of course he gets the blame even more so because he is married. But my point here is that the women he bedded are not saints but are rather easy-to-get, who essentially sell themselves for money. I find that disgusting.

And on that note, I read that his wife wants half of Tiger's earnings.  As far as I know, she was an au pair when she met Tiger through the golfer whose children she was babysitting.  The two had a romance and they planned to marry, signing a prenup. She recently has received $5 million of the $10 million she was entitled at the end of 10 years of marriage – since the relationship is practically over and she already has $5 million, she will probably get the remaining 5 million much sooner than she expected.  But I can't see how she can make a claim for half his worth considering they have a prenup.  Even if the prenup is nullified (which I doubt), why should she get half of his money for a five-year marriage?

Isn't this another form of prostitution?  We have these women marrying rich men and signing prenups – probably because they are already aware who these men are, and want some sort of monetary compensation when the inevitable happens. The prenup is a deal that clearly defines what the woman is entitled to if the marriage ends in divorce. If she divorces him, she will also get alimony and child support for their children, but expecting half of his net worth is outrageous, and no one deserves half of someone's money.  I don't care if it's the government, or a divorced spouse.

14 posted on 12/16/2009 7:46:55 PM PST by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson