You continue to equate “right” with legal opinions.
A legal opinion may or may not be “right”.
You sure are one mixed up dude... LOL...
You might have missed it, but this wasn't an "legal opinion" out of some lawyer's office... but a judge's decision in a case brought to a judge for just such a decision.
I have found out that there are some FReepers that do have a problem assimilating the "reality" that occurs around them in the real world. I can't help you too much with that one.
Ah, but it’s not. The Supreme Court is not intended to be the most powerful branch of government.
I see you have trouble reading, too... and I don't think I can help you there, with your reading skills either...
But, I will give you the rundown once again, that we've got three branches of government and when the Supreme Court makes that final decision, that's it. There are no more legal steps to take and that's the end of the road, as far as the legal system is concerned.
Now, if citizens want to change the law to get a different result, they are more than able to do so... but for you to convince a bunch of voters to help you out in this situation -- you're gonna have to get a better grip on reality... :-)
You can “LOL” all you want, but what is legal has little to do with what is “right” or “wrong”.
As I said, you've got big trouble with reading and comprehension. You'll have to go back and slow down this time and try it "word for word". It may come to you... LOL...
I said...
You can fiddle with the words all you want and it still won't change the fact that the "right" of the matter in our legal system -- is what you "can do" -- and the "wrong" of the matter is what you cannot do... LOL...
Now, convince yourself any way you want, but when you "hit the legal system" -- you'll find out that as far as its concerned -- what you "can do" in the legal system is "right" and what you can't do in the legal system is "wrong"...
I'm sorry you didn't learn that at an earlier age. It can be disconcerting to have your worldview shaken up at a later age... :-)
“You might have missed it, but this wasn’t an “legal opinion” out of some lawyer’s office... but a judge’s decision in a case brought to a judge for just such a decision.”
A judge’s *opinion*. You do know that’s what they call it? A written *opinion*.
We don’t have a Papal infallibility assumption for our judges.
“But, I will give you the rundown once again, that we’ve got three branches of government and when the Supreme Court makes that final decision, that’s it. There are no more legal steps to take and that’s the end of the road, as far as the legal system is concerned.”
Nope. The other legislative branch can counter with another law. The USSC was intended to be the weakest branch, as they are not directly accountable to the people.
“Now, convince yourself any way you want, but when you “hit the legal system” — you’ll find out that as far as its concerned — what you “can do” in the legal system is “right” and what you can’t do in the legal system is “wrong”...”
Which does NOT DAMN WELL MAKE ANYTHING ACTUALLY “RIGHT”. Geez. A judge can disregard the Bill of Rights and frequently does. That doesn’t make them right.. as in CORRECT.
“I’m sorry you didn’t learn that at an earlier age. It can be disconcerting to have your worldview shaken up at a later age... :-)”
You seem confused about the subject of “right” or “wrong”. You equate it only with an opinion of a judge.