No, it becomes precedent.
That's the "right" of the matter.... :-)
BS.
Just because you don't like the fact that a Supreme Court decision is final with the law and the courts -- doesn't make it any different. That's what is "right" in our legal system and that will be the final word.
You're only other alternative is to change the law -- which is one of the options that I was talking about. But, then..., you would have to get a super-majority on your side to change the law and/or the Constitution -- and at this point, you would get nowhere near that... :-)
Uh, no. They’ll define it as “legal”.
You can fiddle with the words all you want and it still won't change the fact that the "right" of the matter in our legal system -- is what you "can do" -- and the "wrong" of the matter is what you cannot do... LOL...
“That’s the “right” of the matter.... :-) “
You continue to equate “right” with legal opinions.
A legal opinion may or may not be “right”.
“Just because you don’t like the fact that a Supreme Court decision is final with the law and the courts — doesn’t make it any different. That’s what is “right” in our legal system and that will be the final word.”
Ah, but it’s not. The Supreme Court is not intended to be the most powerful branch of government.
“You can fiddle with the words all you want and it still won’t change the fact that the “right” of the matter in our legal system — is what you “can do” — and the “wrong” of the matter is what you cannot do... LOL...”
You can “LOL” all you want, but what is legal has little to do with what is “right” or “wrong”.