Let’s see: the judge is right *because* he’s a judge. That’s one of your more entertaining ones.
As it turns out, that's the way it works -- in case you haven't noticed... LOL...
The judge may be overturned, but if he is not and any challenge (if there is any) is upheld -- then it's going to be "just because he said so" -- that's the way it's going to be.
And as I said, if there is a problem that someone doesn't like the "end result" of what the law and judges and judicial system produces -- they've got the right to change it -- but of course, you would have to get a whole bunch of people to agree with you.
The big problem is that you can't even get many people on Free Republic to agree with you -- so I doubt you're gonna change the law, the legal system or this judge's decision...
Keep griping if it makes you happy... LOL...
“As it turns out, that’s the way it works — in case you haven’t noticed... LOL...”
There is a distinct difference between being “legal” and “right”. Plenty of judges are wrong.
“The big problem is that you can’t even get many people on Free Republic to agree with you — so I doubt you’re gonna change the law, the legal system or this judge’s decision...”
Seems to be evenly split here.