Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Marie
I believe a chest x-ray is around 80 milirem, so if one was to multiply 80 by 200-300, the exposure is possibly 16,000-24,000 milirem, divided by 1,000, to get the number of rem, which would be 160-240 rem, an astonishingly high exposure. What I don't know, is whether x-rays and gamma rays harm the body equally, so the conversion may be folly.

The NRC sets a lifetime exposure of 50 rem for radiological industry workers. According to the industry standards, a 650 rem, total body exposure, is a lethal dose. 50% of those exposed to 650 rem are expected to die in 2 weeks. What I don't know, is how long the exposure has to be, to the whole body, to get a lethal dose at 650 rem.

Granted, a CT scan is focused, therefore practically the entire body escapes exposure to a high dose of radiation. Not something to take lightly though.

In your son's case, it is easy to discern that, the benefit of knowing how much damage to his body existed internally, versus the exposure, was worth the trade off.

That's one scary injury. Hopefully, he healed up and is healthy as ever.

64 posted on 12/15/2009 6:48:42 AM PST by freepersup (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]


To: freepersup

make that 16 to 24 Rem, wjile still high, not life threatening in the least.


68 posted on 12/15/2009 7:34:03 AM PST by RoadGumby (God did not evolve mankind from pond scum, but it might be easy to think that about liberals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

To: freepersup

I knew that guy was a butt-head! ;-)


69 posted on 12/15/2009 7:38:30 AM PST by Marie (Obama seems to think that Jerusalem has been the capital of Israel since Camp David, not King David)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson