Approximately 50 posts by you since 12-1-09 of which
10 on Tiger Woods affair
1 on Rosanne Barr
1 on Michelle obama
2 on Joel daughter overdose.
2 on doping kids...which you are right about.
the rest on peripheral to non peripheral political stuff both current and whimsical..but none specifically about healthcare.
you’re slamming us for yukking about Woods and not doing our part over healthcare....which is purely an nassumption on your part.so?
Are you talking about on this thread? Because I seem to have forgotten about all of these Tiger threads I've been on.
Your detective work is a massive fail, especially since you completely missed the point--I suspect you know this, and are trying to ibfuscate because you know you're all wet.
From your list, the posts on this thread are this very discussion, the Barr and Michelle ones were a few words of jokes, the Joel daughter posts were about the issue I'm talking with you about now, and if you don't think doping kids concerns healthcare, I have to wonder what dope you're on.
I haven't posted about healthcare--what does that have to do with anything? When have I CLAIMED to have posted about healthcare? The issue we're talking about, which you seem to have forgotten in your silly game of "Gotcha!" which you've failed at, is the COVERAGE. TAKING IN information, not posting about it.
I never said everyone had to be talking healthcare all the time and nothing else, never said people couldn't talk about other issues, never said people couldn't talk about frivolous issues--what I said, and which you childishly are whining about, is that the Tiger coverage is pushing the more important stories out of the news. Please, go on denying that all you like, but the healthcare coverage was indeed prominent in the news before this crap.
Indeed, I do think it's bad form for people who are supposedly in the party of adults to be yukking it up over this pointless, worthless story which is merely an excuse for people to enjoy the soap opera antics while hiding behind a shield of piety. BS is BS, and I'd rather people just admit they get pleasure from seeing strangers who've got more money trip and fall than posing as protectors of decency.
You can justify this silliness all you like. I somehow think, though, that some celebrity stranger's bedroom antics are a lot less important than the takeover by socialists of our nation.