Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: beebuster2000

“national enquirer. seriously guys, come on”

Enquirer has done better reporting than MSM recently. I think they were first to report on some of the Clinton crap. Weren’t they first to have good info on John Edwards and his bimbo? There have been other times when Enquirer has been more honest than the others.


43 posted on 12/10/2009 7:01:55 AM PST by MayflowerMadam (Never argue with a man whose job depends on not being convinced. (Mencken))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: MayflowerMadam
The Enquirer did break the John Edwards story.

I know this may be a "tinfoil hat" theory, but it is shared by some of our FRiends:

Raila Odinga's favorite cousin was ready to select his VP candidate within a few weeks time.

Hillary knew that she would not get the not as she and Raila Odinga's favorite cousin despise each other at the time. Anyway, the Enquirer is owned and operated by Clintonistas.

Finally, the theory?

The Enquirer humiliated and destroyed John Edwards on orders from Hillary Clinton, as it was a calculated and vindictive move to spite Raila Odinga's favorite cousin during his VP selection process. Had the story not made headlines, Edwards would have most likely been selected for VP. If I were Hillary, I would have waited until Edwards was selected and THEN released the story.

The timing and damning effects of that story was the stuff of revenge.

Like I said, it may be a tinfoil theory, but it does make sense.

55 posted on 12/10/2009 7:10:53 AM PST by GI Joe Fan (GI Joe represents Real American Heroes, not a bunch of globalist drones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson