I read a little about it when the news first broke, but now I refuse to hear, listen to or read anything more re: what appears to be the latest distraction and voyeur interest ala Michael Jackson or Ana Nicole Smith.
Guess I must be getting old or not with it, as I am more interested in Climategate, O'Bozzo's Death Care, the EPA's usurping power and control over all aspects of Industry, etc., etc., etc.
Nothing personal against Freepers who have a fascination therewith, but I for one, have no interest in this expose.
It's a miracle that you made it on this thread to tell us about it.
So how much "less" could you care? It's "couldn't care."
How does that work?
No but you are longest winded.
"I don't care." in 114 words ...
Try watching ESPN for the past two days... every 15 minutes, they’re playing the 911 call for his mother-in-law’s fainting spell (and possible heart attack). She’s 57, not an athlete, and the 911 call is utterly uninteresting. (”Oh. She’s okay.”) This has nothing to do with sports, it most likely has nothing to do with Woods’ “transgressions”, and is merely an excuse to talk about it, without talking about it, 4-5 times every hour. Zzzzzzz!
“Guess I must be getting old or not with it, as I am more interested in Climategate, O’Bozzo’s Death Care, the EPA’s usurping power and control over all aspects of Industry, etc., etc., etc.”
the above you mention are real ‘news’ in the sense that they are external events that can and will (negatively) impact all of us. The media as a rule knows better than to get the tax serfs riled up over anything of substance, though.
I know exactly what you mean. I’ve tried to “care less”, but just couldn’t!