Posted on 12/06/2009 6:09:22 AM PST by BeAllYouCanBe
Amid all the headlines generated by Tiger Woods' troubles — the puzzling car accident, the suggestions of marital turmoil and multiple mistresses — little attention has been given to the race of the women linked with the world's greatest golfer.
Except in the black community.
When three white women were said to be romantically involved with Woods in addition to his blonde, Swedish wife, blogs, airwaves and barbershops started humming, and Woods' already tenuous standing among many blacks took a beating.
On the nationally syndicated Tom Joyner radio show, Woods was the butt of jokes all week.
"Thankfully, Tiger, you didn't marry a black woman. Because if a sister caught you running around with a bunch of white hoochie-mamas," one parody suggests in song, she would have castrated him.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...
Nothing beats the racial insanity of the left when they try to discuss “race.” The hypocrisy and outright backwardness of the comments by most of the people in the article is dismaying. Obviously many libs don’t believe in the melting pot. Another reason why logic from the left is not to be expected and further reasons to ignore whatever they have to say.
Yea!They seem to forget that Homicidal maniac O.J.Simpson when it’s conveniant.He was always chasing white females and murdering them.
I’ll try to find a reference to it, if I can.
If we go back far enough, I'm sure many people who think they're some sort of purebred might be shocked to find out they're not. My father's ancestry is mostly from eastern Europe, but he believes some of his facial features (an epicanthric fold on his eyelids) might come from Mongol invaders from the 1200s. A DNA study would be interesting. Who knows? That's why talking about Woods's "race" and the whole issue of race is ridiculous.
O’bonghit is only 1/8 black as well.
Keep in mind that progeny don’t retain the full genetic complement from both parents.
In a few generations less dominant genetic ancestors could (theoretically) be virtually absent from the visible physiology of their descendants. None the less, they are still part of the make up.
My father’s ancestors migrated to England in the late 18th century from western asia. They took an English name and religion, but were unable to integrate into the british society of the times. They came to the USA in the 1880s and intermarried with Irish and Scotch immigrants.
I watched a documentary a few years back where a man in some English town had his genetic code traced back five thousand years. His ancestors lived in England. Could not tell you which channel or the name of the program.
“Mrs. shove_it says: “he’s not a Tiger, he/s a Cheetah”.”
LOL First time I have heard that, clever!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.