Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: allmost

Yes - and the questions still stand. The fact that human error was involved is not negated by the dog’s actions. Lack of responsible ownership is the problem - not the dog breed or, in this case, type (since the pit bull is not a breed per se.)


21 posted on 12/06/2009 5:19:40 PM PST by JLLH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: JLLH
Yeah, sure, it isn't the breed.

Because if I leave the gate open on a couple Labrador retrievers they would be out in the street in seconds all OVER that 70 year old lady.... sniffing her and trying to get her to pet them.

If you have a caged beast that is ready and ABLE to kill the second it gets out...... no, couldn't be the breed.

After all, it isn't like dogs have personalities to go with their intended function.... Oh wait THEY DO!

Dogs bred to fight and kill..... fight and kill. Pits were bred to fight and kill.

22 posted on 12/06/2009 5:26:27 PM PST by allmendream (Wealth is EARNED not distributed, so how could it be RE-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: JLLH

How much time and effort would it take to train an animal to rip off a 70+ year old lady’s scalp? The human factor goes both ways. It is irrelevant when it comes to pits. You’ve got your reasons for liking them. I have my reasons for not liking them. I don’t promote ‘killing them all’ or anything like that. Just feel safer next to a gator.


23 posted on 12/06/2009 5:37:43 PM PST by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson