Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House claims executive privilege in probe into party crashers; will not cooperate
Fox News Channel | 12/3/09

Posted on 12/03/2009 6:14:12 AM PST by pabianice

Fox reporting. Gibbs has changed his story from "unauthoized people at the reception" to "an internal affair covered by executive privilege." Says will ignore subpoenas.


TOPICS: Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: desireerogers; partygate; secretservice
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 12/03/2009 6:14:13 AM PST by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pabianice

“The most open and transparent administration in U.S. history.”


2 posted on 12/03/2009 6:15:14 AM PST by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

Backhanded admission of guilt!


3 posted on 12/03/2009 6:16:39 AM PST by SonOfDarkSkies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

In other words: They were invited guests and we were using them for political purposes by saying they were party crashers. Most “open and honest administration” my ass. They are liars.


4 posted on 12/03/2009 6:17:08 AM PST by CodeToad (If it weren't for physics and law enforcement I'd be unstoppable!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

gotta protect his peeps.


5 posted on 12/03/2009 6:17:41 AM PST by pioneerstakethearrows
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

A breach of national security and the Obamao’s are giving the person in charge a pass.

That said, hubby forgot to put his shaving cream in the carry on bag this week and TSA was all over him. Had to search his bag.


6 posted on 12/03/2009 6:20:39 AM PST by Carley (OBAMA IS A MALEVOLENT FORCE IN THE WORLD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

Reminds me of good ole Billy Boy, who said that his administration would be the most ETHICAL in the history of the US. I’m to the point I don’t trust ANY POLITICAN. I’m just sorry that all of those in congress don’t have an AUTOMATIC term limit.


7 posted on 12/03/2009 6:22:26 AM PST by kagnew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
Considering this person is one Michelle O's friends...I'm not surprised.

Pretty reprehensible they are trying to throw the Secret Service under the bus for something they know is the fault of the staff...

But again...not surprised.

8 posted on 12/03/2009 6:23:42 AM PST by NMEwithin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SonOfDarkSkies
Bigger question...

Who else was "there" but not on the official (published) guest list????

9 posted on 12/03/2009 6:26:18 AM PST by gov_bean_ counter (Sarah Palin - For such a time as this)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
A few days ago, I voiced my suspicion that the real story was that they were invited, but left off the written list because of the husband's Palestinian connections. Then when they were noticed to have been there some idiot said they must have crashed the party, not realizing the security implications of the statement.

I'm thinking I was right.

10 posted on 12/03/2009 6:26:45 AM PST by PapaBear3625 (Public healthcare looks like it will work as well as public housing did.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

So much for transparency!!


11 posted on 12/03/2009 6:32:13 AM PST by suffolkgentleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

They are protecting elitist Desiree Rogers who, instead of manning the guest list, was socializing.


12 posted on 12/03/2009 6:32:49 AM PST by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

This was a SET UP with NBC, BRAVO and the White House....period.......how immature and GAUCHE.


13 posted on 12/03/2009 6:33:36 AM PST by Ann Archy (Abortion,,,,,,the Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter
Good point!
14 posted on 12/03/2009 6:45:15 AM PST by SonOfDarkSkies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

There have to be statements by the Big Zero about the Bush Administration not sharing information about something. I would love to see a comparison between Bozo’s criticisms of the Bush Admin not “sharing” sensitive information and Dumbo’s WH not sharing info about such an important subject as.........gate crashers!

LOL

The WH has become a freak show!


15 posted on 12/03/2009 6:54:23 AM PST by Happyinmygarden (Yes, actually, I have pretty much seen and heard it all before...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter

“Who else was “there” but not on the official (published) guest list????”

“Check under the A’s, for the name Ayers. That’s spelled A-Y-E-R-S”


16 posted on 12/03/2009 6:56:13 AM PST by Happyinmygarden (Yes, actually, I have pretty much seen and heard it all before...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sarasota

“They are protecting elitist Desiree Rogers who, instead of manning the guest list, was socializing.”

Agreed. She’s dirty and I came to that conclusion as soon as I saw her first statement after the incident in which she said she never told the couple that there were no tickets available.

It was just another example of the dodge and dishonesty of this scummy Administration and loser led Dem congress.


17 posted on 12/03/2009 6:59:18 AM PST by AlphaOneAlpha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

To: SonOfDarkSkies

Yep, I agree. The White House or someone within the White House circumvented the Secret Service and now that accountability has come calling, they are taking the “executive privilege” high road of lame excuses. What a joke this adminstration has become in less than a year in place.


19 posted on 12/03/2009 7:01:56 AM PST by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NMEwithin

“Pretty reprehensible they are trying to throw the Secret Service under the bus for something they know is the fault of the staff... “

This was my assumption from first second I heard of this.


20 posted on 12/03/2009 7:02:05 AM PST by HereInTheHeartland (The End of an Error - 01/20/2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson