Many of us here are defending what we consider a basic conservative value here.
Maybe so... but, from what I saw (also) there were FReepers basically trashing another basic value (having to do with our Constitutional rights) in this story...
And that was one thing I posted frequently on, during this story...
And actually, I would consider that one Constitutional rights issue to be the overwhelmingly more important "story" here -- and way over and beyond whatever was going on with Tiger Woods privately...
And yet..., even so... many were actually more concerned with the salacious gossip and rumor-mongering than the Constitutional issue raised (in discussion here and the mistaken assertions that FReepers were making in regards to it...).
I hadn’t thought of it that way and it’s very relevant.