She’s the one who should be answering that question, but the crazy ethics laws on the books in Alaska aren’t federal laws, nor is there anything similar at the federal level, so a situation where she’s facing personal bankruptcy at the hands of troublemakers is highly unlikely with her in the oval office.
It’s pure conjecture on my part, but I firmly believe that between the enemies she made in the Alaska Republican Party, along with the Democrats’ partisan hatred, they would have had the votes to impeach her for something just to destroy her for 2012 before her term was up.
Your question is a fair one, but one that only Sarah is qualified to answer. How she deals with it will go a long way to show her viability as a candidate.
“Your question is a fair one, but one that only Sarah is qualified to answer.”
Her best answer, if she does run, will be the effectiveness of her campaign (as well as the debates) and how she deals with attacks. That’s why I think most of these discussions about presidential candidates are a little pointless, the front runner at the beginning very often does not win the nomination.