Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BufordP
It serves as a warning that any positive remarks about Rudy McRomney on FR could be considered a banable (sp?) offense. No one can say they were not warned.

I like Jim Robinson and I've been on here a while, but I cannot see that posting positive remarks should constitute grounds for being banned unless they were provably untrue. It would then be the possibility of intentionally misleading people that would constitute valid grounds. Just making a (true) positive statement grounds for being banned is, well, totalitarian.

Call me naive, but I always thought conservatives prized individual rights, including the right to free political speech.

And I'm pretty tired of seeing the ad myself. Time to load the Hucklebee version, okay?

131 posted on 12/01/2009 9:39:56 AM PST by BelegStrongbow (I'm still waiting for Dear Leader to say something that isn't a lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: BelegStrongbow
...but I cannot see that posting positive remarks should constitute grounds for being banned...

Go back and read my post again and keep in mind I don't do "</sarcasm>" tags. If I did, it wouldn't be sarcasm.

303 posted on 12/01/2009 1:51:23 PM PST by BufordP ("I've abandoned free market principles to save the free market ..." --George "Hoover" Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson