[the invisib1e hand]

You invoked an implied equivalence between the sanctity of privacy that is a right due to any person and the argument of the sanctity of privacy as a justification for abortion.

In an amoral world, this might fly. But we don't live in an amoral world. In a moral world, some rights are subordinate to others.

But of course you know this, it's common sense, your post was just baiting bullshit.

I responded because it's good to restate truths to people who engage in that sort of nonsense.

[Moonman62]

You’ve got it wrong, which I take it is why you swear and use personal attacks to support your case. The fact is there is no right to privacy, and the Supreme Court manufacturing it as a basis for the right to abortion on demand was wrong.