Skip to comments.
U.S. Army Agrees That The M-4 Sucks
Strategy Page ^
| November 25, 2009
Posted on 11/28/2009 2:11:52 AM PST by myknowledge
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Proposed replacements for M4 / M16 assault rifle

FN SCAR

Barrett M468

Heckler & Koch XM8

FN F2000

IMI Tavor TAR-21

Remington ACR
Which rifle would you select as a replacement for the M4 / M16?
I'd go for the Remington ACR.
To: myknowledge
If the issue were put to a vote, the troops would vote for a rifle using a short-stroke system (like the XM8, SCAR or H&K 416)Forgot the AK47 in the list...... pinged to later read after work.
2
posted on
11/28/2009 2:24:45 AM PST
by
MrPiper
To: myknowledge
OK! So whats the hold up. Yesterday would have been soon enough than that's just me.
3
posted on
11/28/2009 2:26:02 AM PST
by
BellStar
(Be strong ........Joshua 1:6)
To: myknowledge
Just adopt the freaking FN SCAR or ACR already. I favor the SCAR, but the ACR may be more politically friendly.
4
posted on
11/28/2009 2:28:15 AM PST
by
Terpfen
(FR is being Alinskied. Remember, you only take flak when you're over the target.)
To: Terpfen
Not only that, the ACR can be modified to fire the AK-47's 7.62 x 39 M43 round.

Imagine that, firing the same ammo as your enemy while still using a U.S. made weapon.
5
posted on
11/28/2009 2:39:21 AM PST
by
myknowledge
(F-22 Raptor: World's Largest Distributor of Sukhoi parts!)
To: myknowledge
The Robinson Arms XCR is not in your list and is, I think, one of the more practical choices. Besides, these are all revisions of the AR-18, the patents to which long ago elapsed. All these manufacturers are just proposing their own innovative twists to the old Stoner concept for proprietary reasons. Instead of rewarding any one of them with a $2000/rifle contract, we should just offer them the opportunity to get in on a $500/rifle contract for new AR-18s.
To: MrPiper
As much as it pains me to say it I have to agree. The AK-47 has a legendary reputation for reliability and a modern variant of it should also be considered as a replacement. It is inexcusable that so many of our troops have to die because of shoddy weaponry.
7
posted on
11/28/2009 3:25:04 AM PST
by
pnh102
(Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
To: pnh102
Yep, the AK-47’s Garand style action just works.
I bet they just replace the M-4 upper with a short stroke piston design.
Us civilians can always buy a Ruger mini-14. Mini-14, get it? M14 made small.
8
posted on
11/28/2009 3:38:16 AM PST
by
Tarpon
(To destroy the people's liberties, you poison their morals ...)
To: pnh102
As much as it pains me to say it I have to agree. The AK-47 has a legendary reputation for reliability and a modern variant of it should also be considered as a replacement. It is inexcusable that so many of our troops have to die because of shoddy weaponry.The AK design does not meet military accuracy requirements in its original design.
Oh, you can 'accurize' an AK, but it loses its reliability as a result.
It is time for a new weapon system, not a repeat of something (the AK) that is over 70 years old.
9
posted on
11/28/2009 3:45:32 AM PST
by
Erik Latranyi
(Too many conservatives urge retreat when the war of politics doesn't go their way.)
To: Erik Latranyi
The AK as you have stated has poor tolerances, which on one hand makes it able to fire under almost any condition. But on the other does not add to it's accuracy.
My son who has the opportunity to work with most of the above named weapons enjoys the 416.
10
posted on
11/28/2009 4:20:37 AM PST
by
Recon Dad
(SSgt O - 3rd Afghanistan Deployment - Day 37)
To: Recon Dad
I do a couple of deer hunts a year for Veterans with most of them being Iraq or Afghanistan Vets and Im always amazed at how many of them would have preferred having a M-14. Theyre biggest complaint was the 5.56s inability to penetrate the dirt walls.
To: myknowledge
U.S. Army Agrees That The M-4 Sucks
Strategy Page ^ | November 25, 2009
The U.S. Army has finally addressed years of complaints about the M-4 and M-16 assault rifles. The M-4 is a short barrel M-16, and has become very popular with the troops.
Huh? The Army (brass) officially disses the M-16 variant M-4, but the troops themselves want more of ‘em? Huh?
12
posted on
11/28/2009 5:19:30 AM PST
by
flowerplough
( Pennsylvania today - New New Jersey meets North West Virginia.)
To: myknowledge
The army and marines both decided to stick with their current weapons, rather than adopt an easier to maintain weapon, like the XM8 or H&K 416, because of the billion or so dollars it would cost to switch rifles. Here's an idea - recoup a lot of that "billion or so" by selling the old rifles via the CMP.
Tell the ATF to sod-off.
13
posted on
11/28/2009 5:20:30 AM PST
by
DuncanWaring
(The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
To: DuncanWaring
This is totally emotional. ANYTHING FOR OUR MEN AND WOMEN IN COMBAT.
14
posted on
11/28/2009 5:29:26 AM PST
by
AZFolks
To: Dusty Road
My son took four rifles with him to Afghanistan this deployment. A Barrett, M-14, M-40A1 and M-4. He will not have an issue with penetrating power for the most part.
15
posted on
11/28/2009 6:28:44 AM PST
by
Recon Dad
(SSgt O - 3rd Afghanistan Deployment - Day 39)
To: Tarpon
The problem with the Mini 14 is that it isnt really a accurate rifle. Plus the fact it is chambered for.223 and not 5.56, a small but important detail.
16
posted on
11/28/2009 6:58:32 AM PST
by
Yorlik803
(better to die on your feet than live on your knees.)
I propose a “skeet” test.
Taka a couple dozen Taliban, launch them into the air, and we’ll see how good these rifles are. :)
-—”I love the peasants, I love the people...PULL!!!!”
(History of the World, Part One)
17
posted on
11/28/2009 8:11:12 AM PST
by
ak267
To: myknowledge
So can the SCAR. Not a unique feature.
18
posted on
11/28/2009 10:22:26 AM PST
by
Terpfen
(FR is being Alinskied. Remember, you only take flak when you're over the target.)
To: myknowledge
A buddy of mine was able to shoot the SCAR recently. He’s a writer for a major shooting magazine. He said the SCAR was extremely accurate, but too heavy, and the charging handle was on the wrong side.
This is a guy who has his own HK 416 too, so he knows what he’s talking about. He said the SCAR could be tweeked to be a fantastic battle rifle.
19
posted on
11/28/2009 11:39:47 AM PST
by
Armedanddangerous
(I think youre so full of inconsolable rage you don't care who you hurt)
To: Yorlik803
the Mini is very inaccurate at distances where M16s and M4s have no trouble getting the hits at all.
20
posted on
11/28/2009 11:41:25 AM PST
by
Armedanddangerous
(I think youre so full of inconsolable rage you don't care who you hurt)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson