Seems like far too many people are dwelling on the negative (kind of like giving directions from NYC to LA by telling what routes NOT to take) and expending far too much effort on things that are of no immediate consequence (if a much stronger candidate emerges Romni will not be of any consequence, if not it doesn’t matter if he is the candidate).
Right now I am much more concerned about 2010 than 2012.
........Right now I am much more concerned about 2010 than 2012................
That’s very true!
But we have to keep a focus on 2012.
Zer0 on the one side:
Who’s to beat him on the other side?
Time to keep the powder dry, for anyone qualified and wiling to have reloaded and step up to the front line to kill the enemy.
We don’t know whether that’s Mitt, Palin, Huckabee, or anybody else, but why does FR go to such unrelented lengths to trash Romney at this stage of the fight.
I’m taking flak tonight, I hope I take more, because I want a real impartial debate to take place amongst our pubbie 50% of the population, without trashing either of the possible contenders!
There are huge negatives to Mitt Romney and I fail to see much positive about him from a conservative perspective.
The only thing I can see in his favor is possibly business experience. But let me ask one thing. Did he leave Mass. with a budget surplus? Did he cut taxes there?
Since he’s anti-gun and pro-socialized medicine I could never support him for president in any case. He may be slightly better than obama but would be horrible for the Republican party.