What you described above is no change to the balance of power. As many posters previously tried to explain to you, RINOs act just like Democrats when in office, except that ALL Republicans get the blame for their bad decisions.
According to a recent Gallup poll, conservatives are the largest plurality of voters at more than 40%, moderates are next at 37%, and liberals at less than 20%.
For many years the liberal Democrats and liberal RINOs have had the electorate snookered into believing they were two different groups. Conservatives were forced to either vote for the slightly less liberal RINO, or concede to the very liberal Democrat. No more. Liberals chose Gulliani, Romney, and McCain to be the 2008 Republican primary candidates to prevent any chance of a conservative having a voice. We don't intend to let the liberal media and liberal RINOs in DC and NY pick our candidates, not for 2010, not for 2012, or any other time.
When the GOP runs conservative candidates, the GOP wins, along with the whole electorate.
When the GOP runs liberal candidates, the GOP loses, along with the whole electorate.
Sarah Palin is the only conservative among many potential candidate names currently being tossed about for the 2012 presidential election. If Jim DeMint and Michele Bachmann were added to the list, then there would be more.
Sorry, Romney doesn't make the cut, no matter how much he spends, or how many people he sends out to infiltrate conservative websites. It is nothing personal; it is a matter of principle. He doesn't have any.
“When the GOP runs conservative candidates, the GOP wins, along with the whole electorate.
When the GOP runs liberal candidates, the GOP loses, along with the whole electorate. “
Even when the GOP runs conservative candidates and the GOP happens to lose, at least the argument has been presented to the whole electorate and you have a chance the next time around..