[Sibre Fan]

Context: Berg was never listed as counsel on this appeal, and Joyce withdrew as Hollister's attorney a few weeks ago and Hemenway became Hollister's only counsel. Joyce says, in the Motion, that he is filing this brief because [F]or the reasons stated below, we believe this change in representation could result in a less-than-sufficient presentation of all issues for this Court’s consideration unless this Motion to File the amicus Brief is granted. Berg seeks Amicus status because of his interest in his other cases, and because, among other reasons: There is much to say about Orly Taitz, Esquire, but since the matter is under litigation at the moment, it is not advisable to say more here than is absolutely necessary. Suffice to say, I note, that just recently, the U.S. District Court for the Central District of Georgia held her in contempt and found it necessary to impose a sanction of $20,000. And in the aforementioned Barnett case, the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California took note of the fact that it had received a statement from someone who told the Court that Orly Taitz, Esquire had tried to suborn perjury through the testimony she wanted him to give in that case. Since public perception now links anyone who is associated with any lawsuit which questions Soetoro’s Constitutional qualifications to be President with Orly Taitz, Esquire and since I have my own claims to adjudicate on that point, I respectfully ask this Honorable Court for Leave to be this Court’s amicus with this Brief.

[Dryman]

“FREE THE LONG FORM!”

[Non-Sequitur]

Doesn’t think much of Orly, does he?

[El Sordo]

Interesting.

[circumbendibus]

PING!!!

FYI

[parsifal]

The saga continues. Has Orly done anything stupid lately? or should I say, has Orly done anything lately?

parsy, the droll (PS: that’s DROLL, not TROLL!)

[Dajjal]

obumpa