[hinckley buzzard]

The first take by the media seems to be to ignore the fraud being exposed, as if the emails were simply discussions among peers involved in the messy business of science, instead of desperate attempts to falsify data and cover up malfeasance on a historic scale.

Once real scientists begin to take apart the cooked and cherry-picked data, then there will be some weeping and gnashing of teeth.

[dennisw]

My take is the AGW people are damaged 10%. If we had a more impartial media this would be a scandal. But what does some reporter who is a liberal arts grad know or care about science?