This post epitomizes the problems with your entire posting history and explains why you have been relegated to the Erik von Daniken wing of FR.
1) It is Charles Darwin, not "darwood".
2) You have singled out Darwin but have completely and ignorantly failed to address the works of Jean-Baptiste Lamarak, Charles Lyell, and Thomas Malthus whose works shaped and supported Darwins treatise. Instead you attempt to rely on inflammatory and defaming phrases like "evo-nazi", "Temple of Darwin", darwood" and "evo-religious".
3) As ironic as it might seem to those brighter than you theories "evolve" as new data and tools become available. The "theory" is not "going down in flames". It is more widely supported today than anytime in the last 150 years.
4) Darwin and the theory he articulated NEVER sought to address creation, only the origin of the diversity of life.
5) Argumentum ad Naseum doesn't work in real life. Stomping your feet and screaming until your mommy relented and gave you a sugar treat might have shaped you personality and debating style but it won't (positively) shape perception of you or your flawed assessment of science or Scripture.
6) Bullying won't work either as neither the intellectual content or the abrasive style of your postings is in the least bit intimidating.