To: count-your-change
You never addressed the fact that Mr. Thomas attempted to leave the false impression that these chemicals were not fossilized.
However very nice attempt at dancing around the facts I am actually impressed by the effort you put into this.
52 posted on
11/22/2009 7:56:39 PM PST by
Ira_Louvin
(Go tell them people lost in sin, Theres a higher power ,They need not fear the works of men.)
To: Ira_Louvin
"
attempted to leave the false impression that these chemicals were not fossilized." Hey worm brain, just how would a 'chemical' get 'fissilized?'
You haven't the slightest notion what fossilization even is!
66 posted on
11/22/2009 9:10:01 PM PST by
editor-surveyor
(The beginning of the O'Bomb-a administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
To: Ira_Louvin
Actually, I did, but I suppose you weren't paying attention.
Despite your other comments I don't think you really mean “fossilized” chemicals, do you? If so you'll have to explain that process seeing I know of no such thing.
And while I often disagree with Thomas when he ties his conclusions to the science articles he posts I've never thought there was any attempt at deception or the like. To accuse him on the basis of what you think he should have or could have said instead of what he actually DID say seems intolerably petty and quite pointless.
But perhaps that is your point, I should hope not.
85 posted on
11/23/2009 9:27:01 AM PST by
count-your-change
(You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson