Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: tired_old_conservative

So the framers invented “Natural Born Citizen” for the Presidential qualification, even though in your estimation it has the same meaning as “Citizen”?

I don’t think you really believe that do you?


52 posted on 11/15/2009 11:44:29 PM PST by plenipotentiary (Obama was a BRITISH SUBJECT at birth, passed to him via Pops, can't be NBC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: plenipotentiary
“Natural Born Citizen” does not have the same meaning as “citizen”, given that citizen can include naturalized citizens. It is the proposed distinction between “natural born citizen” and a “born here” citizen that I think is meaningless.

Whether you personally think what the Indiana court did is right or not, they didn't just make it up. There's a pretty straight forward path to arrive at the conclusion they did. I strongly suspect no other court will arrive at a different conclusion.

53 posted on 11/16/2009 6:29:39 PM PST by tired_old_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson