[El Gato]

The judge didn't make his ruling based on Sinclair's affidavit, so there was no finding of whether Sinclair's claims about Taitz are factual.

True, but that also means he should not have mentioned it in his ruling. Especially considering that the afidavit had never been entered into evidence, and Mrs. Taitz never got a chance to challenge its contents.

[Canadian Outrage]

Since I have worked in the legal field for 23 years, what you just said, is absolutely true. A Judge cannot mention anything in his ruling concerning an Affidavit unless and until it has been entered and argued. Courts do not work that way and if they do, they are FIXED. CO