[Sibre Fan]

Is this the case that has Berg’s evidence under wraps because of a court order?

No. First, this is the original case that was filed in August 2008.

Second, I'm not sure what case you're speaking of when you say it involves evidence Berg has under wraps. Berg's False Claims Act case was under seal originally, but it was unsealed a couple months ago when the Court dismissed his case. Berg described his evidence (i.e., the same evidence as in the PA case that was subject to today's 3rd Circuit opinion) in his motion for reconsideration. That case is currently on appeal in the D.C. Court of Appeals -- the same court in which Hollister's appeal is currently pending.

[usmcobra]

It is my understanding that There is evidence that Berg has that is still sealed by a court’s decision.

I was wondering if it was this case.