Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Drew68
“While Mr. Valamoor will surely claim that he didn't work on Obama case before, his employment with Perkins Coie, should’ve disqualified him, and indeed the order reads as if it was written by defense counsel, highly biased against the plaintiffs, 99 percent of the order either misstates the facts or the pleadings or oral argument, it misstates the law and is full of personal attacks, de facto accusing decorated members of the military of being cowards; and this order is particularly used as a tool in what seems a concerted effort by this court and judge Clay D. Land in GA to use the power of federal judiciary to publicly lynch the undersigned counsel, to use innuendo, ex parte defamatory and slanderous statements to assassinate her character, to destroy her as a human being and endanger her law license, only because she is not only the only attorney brave enough to bring most of eligibility legal actions, to bring actions from plaintiffs with real standing, the only one to get any hearings, but she is also the only one to bring forward evidence from licensed investigators showing Mr. Obama committing multiple felonies, for which he should be serving lengthy prison term.”

That is one serious run-on sentence.

Man. Seriously, this isn't a motion; it's a cry for help. To anyone with any real experience in the law, courts, or simply framing an argument, this is obviously deranged.

49 posted on 11/10/2009 12:15:42 PM PST by tired_old_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: tired_old_conservative
“While Mr. Valamoor will surely claim that he didn't work on Obama case before, his employment with Perkins Coie, should’ve disqualified him, and indeed the order reads as if it was written by defense counsel, highly biased against the plaintiffs,

Orly knew that Judge Carter had hired a clerk from Perkins Coie before Judge Carter dismissed her case. Federal law is clear that a motion to recuse a judge for bias has to be made before he rules, because otherwise a party could game the system by accepting the judge's ruling if they win but demanding a do-over if they lose.

Orly knows that this is the law because one of the things Judge Land sanctioned her $20,000 for was waiting to move to disqualify him until after he ruled. For her to do the same thing again is just begging for more sanctions.

61 posted on 11/10/2009 5:41:23 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson