Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Tempest
I've found it odd how the party that claims to support family values can hail this vile and morally bankrupt woman as such an iconic hero. What did she achieve, besides the corruption of souls.

What she pointed out is that people are individuals and need to be held to that personal responsibility. To contrast, many collectivists are so lost in group-approval syndrome that even when attempting to be manipulative, they spontaneously use group phrases without even realizing it, like "the party that claims." For all of Rands personal faults, she has had an enormously positive effect of millions of people's understanding of personal responsibility in politics, and the absolute evil of collectivism in any form.

As a result, collectivists hate her with a passion few others receive, and can't help using such derogatory, dehumanizing, hate-filled descriptions such as "vile" and "morally bankrupt." Others go so far as to cynically invoke Christian morality through the use of terms such as "family values" and "corrupter of souls," all while trying to turn their audience against a person who fought against the most satanic of all political threats in the world.

All in all, she evokes an interesting reaction from collectivists the world over.

6 posted on 11/03/2009 12:23:57 AM PST by Talisker (When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on it's own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Talisker

I know what you mean.. Collectivist obviously hate all people who preach personal responsibiity. Like Jesus, Law-enforcement personel, and Smokey the Bear...

It all makes sense now. Totally good reason to have Rand as a mascot...


9 posted on 11/03/2009 12:27:03 AM PST by Tempest (I believe in the sanctity of life... As long as you can afford it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Talisker

What I find most amusing about the liberal “hatred” of Ayn Rand is that if she was an admirer of socialism instead of capitalism, she would be a liberal icon. After all, she was an atheist, a supporter of abortion, brazenly committed adultery and was by most accounts an immoral mean-spirited woman who had no tolerance for anybody who had a different opinion. In other words, she was in many ways, the prototype liberal and aside from her political beliefs, would have mixed well with the likes of Hillary Clinton, Ted Kennedy, Nancy Pelosi and Barney Frank.


73 posted on 11/03/2009 2:21:56 AM PST by SamAdams76 (I am 53 days away from outliving Lefty Frizzell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson