[Canedawg]

rest assured, we’ll be all over it if and when one gains significant traction.

And why is that?

Because you want to know as much as anyone else what his authentic BC says?

Because you anticpate the constitutional crisis that may occur if it is found that he is not qualified to hold office?

Because you are interested in seeing what discovery is produced and exposed for public consumption?

Because you want to see if the threats of violence are real if the cowards ever back off from their stonewalling and allow the authentic BC to be examined in the public light?

[Seizethecarp]

Per Jones...

rest assured, we’ll be all over it if and when one gains significant traction.

Per Canedawg:

“And why is that?”

Maybe Jones just wants to reassure us that the White House War on Fox (WSJ is Murdock/FOX) will not intimidate the WSJ legal blog? As you point out, Jones doesn't explain why WSJ/FOX aren't taking the lead on investigating the vetting of Obama's NBC soil and blood eligibility, rather than just sitting around waiting for a case to "gain traction." Is it FCC threats that Beck is putting up on his chalkboard???