[LucyT]

Check out article and #15.

[Thanks, PennsylvaniaMom.]

.

[PennsylvaniaMom]

You are welcome Lucy (thank YOU for all YOU do alerting us...and keeping things updated and explained.

I would suggest reading the comments pages as well...surprisingly there are quite a few posters who are questioning EVERYTHING!!!

[thecodont]

Thanks for the ping. I'm very glad the WSJ is giving this attention.

I am keeping an eye on certain legal blogs about the buzz on this.

Check out this lib one:

"-- Birther Queen/Attention Whore Orly Taitz serves as a bright shining example to those awaiting their bar results that all that anxiety was for naught. (i.e., if she's a member of the Bar, how did you ever doubt yourself?) Conversely, she'll pile on to the anxiety for those who don't quite make it this time around. (i.e., but SHE passed?) Someone should remind her: when a judge imposes sanctions sua sponte, that's usually not an indication that the judge is out to get you, but that you're THAT crazy (and yes, there is a line that can be crossed after which it's no longer about the legal arguments you put forth but you personally)."