Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: skr

This has nothing to do with the NY-23 race. If you would rather a middle of the road RINo instead of a Democrat in NY-3, King had to be visually opposed to the rabid right wing (especially Palin) to maintain his standing in the district he represents.

You, even if you don’t know it, want King to be reelected over any of the Long Island machine Democrats that would beat him if King was framed as attached to the hip to Palin or Hoffman.


6 posted on 10/31/2009 4:01:04 PM PDT by JerseyHighlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: JerseyHighlander

The strategy of accepting these guys because there as good as were going to get has failed. The country is in peril because of it. I only support people who people who believe in the Constitution and Freedom. King doesn’t live up to my litmus test.


12 posted on 10/31/2009 4:33:45 PM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: JerseyHighlander

My statement has only to do with not being surprised that one RINO endorsed another RINO; sometimes RINOs vote correctly for whatever reason, perhaps even for a principled one.

King has his moments, and if his district is unable to find enough voters for a conservative representative , his occasional correct vote is better than none at all. I don’t think he had to “visually” oppose Palin; he could’ve just focussed on the issues and ignored her; she’s not running for his office.

Palin’s governing record is hardly that of the “rabid right-wing”; she’s a pragmatic conservative. This appears to terrify liberals and RINOs.


27 posted on 11/01/2009 5:18:12 PM PST by skr (May God confound the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson