of course they are kooks, they disagree with the the religion of evolutionism.
classic ploy, demonize and minimize your opponent, and his methods as opposed to engaging in dialog with them directly and debating their points....
easier to post here on FR and denigrate them. sound technique there...
How much time and in how much scientific depth are you prepared to assess their technical papers?
Guy Berthault is a nut-job. Read through the following link and get back to me.
http://www.evolutionpages.com/berthault_critique.htm
Maciej Giertych is a communist loon. Read through the following link and get back to me. http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2006/11/nature_publishes_a_crank_lette.php Thomas Seiler is a poor physicist based upon his presentation. He bases his entire presentation upon an incorrect probability presumption and further misstated evolutionary systems as "closed systems". Life on earth is not an isolated system at thermodynamic equilibrium. This presumption leads him to wrongly calculate the impact of Boltzmann's constant on the Entropy calculation.
Dr Josef Holzschuh identifies the flaw in Dr. Seiler's paper, but dismisses it out of hand, with no data or substantiation with the following conclusion:
To confuse the natural low energy state of ordered molecules with high energy formation of complex biological molecules is a common and unacceptable error."
Shall I continue or do you want to defend to discuss any of the above in more detail? There is an explanation to Creation that satisfies both the science and the theology. It is called Theistic Evolution. Care to consider or discuss that?