To: ButThreeLeftsDo
the Internet's infrastructure could be overwhelmed by people logging in from home. Non sequitur.
An ill worker staying home and logging in...is a worker who would be using the internet at work anyway. Net difference...0.000.
12 posted on
10/29/2009 11:35:58 AM PDT by
Bloody Sam Roberts
(An armed man is a citizen. An unarmed man is a subject.)
To: Bloody Sam Roberts
That was my first thought too. But consider that if you normally communicate with many other people in one location at your firm, your traffic does not traverse the internet: it simply stays on your subnet.
So actually, if huge quantities of people stayed home and logged in, it would increase the traffic on the internet.
I doubt if it’s anything to seriously worry about though.
13 posted on
10/29/2009 12:04:49 PM PDT by
Pessimist
(u)
To: Bloody Sam Roberts
Non sequitur. An ill worker staying home and logging in...is a worker who would be using the internet at work anyway. Net difference...0.000.
Their total bandwidth usage would be higher as most telecommuters establish a virtual private network (VPN) to their company via the Internet for access to corporate systems. General Internet surfing would be a zero sum however there would be increased network use from multiple VPN's.
15 posted on
10/29/2009 12:58:19 PM PDT by
TSgt
(I long for Norman Rockwell's America.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson