Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: NonValueAdded

I don’t believe that a trust can be set up for the benefit of those not yet born. The benificaries have to be alive at the time of the bequest or establishment of the trust.


52 posted on 10/28/2009 1:21:49 PM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (The People have abdicated our duties; ... and anxiously hope for just two things: bread and circuses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: Lonesome in Massachussets
I don’t believe that a trust can be set up for the benefit of those not yet born. The benificaries have to be alive at the time of the bequest or establishment of the trust.

I am not concrete on that answer either.

But in the case of Garth Brooks, his already born children are going to get it, and if Garth dies before grandchildren are born, the parents can easily add them, and it continues on down the line.

55 posted on 10/28/2009 1:58:15 PM PDT by Phantom Lord (Fall on to your knees for the Phantom Lord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets

“I don’t believe that a trust can be set up for the benefit of those not yet born.”

Ah, but you can establish a family “foundation,” as the Fords, Rockefellers, and Kennedys have done. It shields the family wealth from the taxes that the “little people” have to pay, and generations yet unborn can go into “public service,” fleecing said “little people,” while living off of great-grandad’s money.


61 posted on 10/29/2009 9:46:53 AM PDT by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson