Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ShadowAce

Then I’m assuming it’s the P2P sites they’re targeting?


7 posted on 10/24/2009 12:43:14 PM PDT by Dallas59 (No To O -Time is going by really really really really slow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Dallas59
"Then I’m assuming it’s the P2P sites they’re targeting?"

Not sites, but ports and protocols, via deep packet inspection by QOS. Not THAT should be illegal if it isn't clearly stated in your ISP service agreement. The entire 'net neutrality' issues is a question of whether companies can allow site subscribers to pay more to allow their traffic to have better performance. I'm against that. The net should remain the way it is now. You subscribe to a connection with bandwidth, and you should get that bandwidth.

12 posted on 10/24/2009 3:03:52 PM PDT by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson