To: meandog
LOL
Now Rosie’s “wife” gets to present a claim for half of Rosie’s estate.
If they were simply cohabitating, the “wife” would get little or nothing.
6 posted on
10/21/2009 7:51:17 AM PDT by
earlJam
To: earlJam
If they were simply cohabitating, the wife would get little or nothing. Tell that to the late Lee Marvin.
11 posted on
10/21/2009 7:53:09 AM PDT by
Yo-Yo
(Joe Wilson speaks for me.)
To: earlJam
If they were simply cohabitating, the wife would get little or nothing. Oops, I was WRONG!!!
I dug into palimony further, and found that the Cali Supreme Court overturned Marvin v. Marvin.
You're right, "no soup for you!" (for just living together.)
19 posted on
10/21/2009 7:58:05 AM PDT by
Yo-Yo
(Joe Wilson speaks for me.)
To: earlJam
I know..for the life of me, I don’t know why wealthy gay men want this marriage thing so badly...THEY HAD IT MADE!!!
99 posted on
10/25/2009 8:55:32 PM PDT by
Hildy
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson