To: TigersEye
That bottom portion was pretty small, even for a 6 year old, theoretically if he was in there, we would have seen some sag or ANY type of movement from that tiny confined space. He would have been smushed in that little part, no way that you couldn’t tell. No way that thing lifts off with a 6 year old in it and the “father” knows that.
21 posted on
10/17/2009 6:01:23 PM PDT by
word_warrior_bob
(You can now see my amazing doggie and new puppy on my homepage!! Come say hello to Jake & Sonny)
To: word_warrior_bob
Those are different issues aren’t they?
24 posted on
10/17/2009 6:11:59 PM PDT by
TigersEye
(Imagine the uproar when people imagine what Rush says?)
To: word_warrior_bob
That bottom portion was pretty small, even for a 6 year old, theoretically if he was in there, we would have seen some sag or ANY type of movement from that tiny confined space From the image I estimate 4' diameter, maybe slightly less than 2' high. Plenty of room for a 6 year old.
If the base floor was 10mm plywood it wouldn't sag (although I would expect some indication of load where it attaches to the balloon - that wasn't there)_
43 posted on
10/18/2009 8:53:42 AM PDT by
Oztrich Boy
(Do you want President Palin flyng in a 35 year old helicopter?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson