Okay, now we’re getting ridiculous up there in Washington, but.. a question: at what age will a cat or a dog be considered “of age” and therefore not qualified to be a “dependent” anymore? Yeah, I know, a ridiculous question.
But, as long as they don’t raise taxes to pay for the lost government revenue from the “giveaways”, I probably wouldn’t mind taking the $3500. It would be my money coming back to me and I could spend it as I see fit and not necessarily on the dog or cat. That $3500 could stimulate my side of the equation in the overall scheme of the economy.
My daughter, a veterinarian, would be very appreciative as well, since perhaps more people would be “stimulated” to adopt some animals and maybe even take them to the vet once in a while. .
Once one reads the actual ‘bill’, and also finds it’s not a top priority with the current session, it seems a pretty good bill.
It’s much better than any other bill that has been in the news the last 10 months.