Advocates for the question of Obama's birth and eligibility being evaluated in court jumped on the ruling to conclude that the judge would not have made the dates final if he was going to dismiss the case and the schedule would be moot anyway.
"The implication of the court's order finalizing the dates is obvious: you do not finalize dates unless there will be a trial," wrote one supporter who contacted WND about the ruling. "And there would not be a trial, unless the Motion to Dismiss requested by the Defense was in whole or in part DENIED."
1 posted on
10/07/2009 4:06:01 PM PDT by
opentalk
To: opentalk
In my opinion it’s just court housekeeping and means nothing.
2 posted on
10/07/2009 4:07:48 PM PDT by
devere
To: opentalk
Great news, I hope/think!! BTTT!!!
3 posted on
10/07/2009 4:08:05 PM PDT by
Genoa
(Luke 12:2)
To: opentalk
Is discovery underway?
Have subpoenaed his school records?
5 posted on
10/07/2009 4:09:31 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(Brave amateurs....they do their part.)
To: opentalk
To: opentalk; Admin Moderator
Shouldn’t this be in Breaking?
11 posted on
10/07/2009 4:19:08 PM PDT by
Genoa
(Luke 12:2)
To: opentalk
Why is the U S ATTORNEY defending in this case against a private citizen????
14 posted on
10/07/2009 4:56:08 PM PDT by
Don Corleone
("Oil the gun..eat the cannolis. Take it to the Mattress.")
To: LucyT
Another one about the same stuff. JFYI.
18 posted on
10/07/2009 6:06:57 PM PDT by
little jeremiah
(Asato Ma Sad Gamaya Tamaso Ma Jyotir Gamaya)
To: opentalk
It is standard practice to set the roadmap for the trial and give tentative dates early on in any lawsuit. These roadmaps are what allow the parties to determine the deadlines for various motions (including motions to dismiss).
19 posted on
10/07/2009 6:23:22 PM PDT by
JimWayne
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson