Skip to comments.
That's One Hell Of A Shot, Serena! Tennis Champ Courts Attention With A Nude Magazine Cover
Daily Mail (UK) ^
| October 05th 2009
Posted on 10/06/2009 7:36:48 PM PDT by Steelfish
That's One Hell Of A Shot, Serena! Tennis Champ Courts Attention With A Nude Magazine Cover
By DAILY MAIL REPORTER 06th October 2009
Serena Williams certainly served up a surprise on the cover of America's ESPN magazine.
The tennis champion peeled off her usual sportswear to appear completely naked on the cover of the publication's 'Body Issue'.
The 28-year-old looks a picture of confidence while wearing nothing but a smile, her modesty saved only by some very strategic posing.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Music/Entertainment; Society
KEYWORDS: badonkadonk; eeeeeeeeeeeyuckkkk; porn; serena
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
To: Joiseydude
Her big arms are quite attractive. Her big ass, not so much.
21
posted on
10/06/2009 7:54:49 PM PDT
by
JillValentine
(I dream of the day when 'Obama' ceases to be a Pavlovian word.)
To: llevrok
tennis babe pingMore like ...
"Now starting at left outside linebacker for the Chicago Bears"
22
posted on
10/06/2009 7:54:57 PM PDT
by
tx_eggman
(Obama has "Czars" because men with more integrity than he has still use the titles "Don" and "Capo")
To: GeronL
She's no Simona Halep.
23
posted on
10/06/2009 7:56:55 PM PDT
by
The Good Doctor
(Democracy is the only system where you can vote for a tax that you can avoid the obligation to pay.)
To: Joiseydude
I truly hope this does not inspire Michelle Obama to compete. Truly, sometimes the burka is better.
To: BGHater
Yes, well, like it or lump it when you’re a girl Nature simply doesn’t allow for much muscle no matter how hard you work it. “Natural” female body builders can be impressive but they never lose their feminine shape and can only get so big. Women on ‘roids always have an unnatural-seeming physique and the Williams girls have that nasty unfeminine look.
25
posted on
10/06/2009 7:57:39 PM PDT
by
sinanju
To: Joiseydude; proudbirther
"Come to Momma!"
To: wastedyears
Speak for yourself. My boyfriend likes my toned arms.
27
posted on
10/06/2009 8:06:31 PM PDT
by
JillValentine
(I dream of the day when 'Obama' ceases to be a Pavlovian word.)
To: whatisthetruth
That does it! My mind’s made up. She is FUGLY!
28
posted on
10/06/2009 8:07:11 PM PDT
by
sinanju
To: Steelfish
if ya got it, flaunt it, baby.
29
posted on
10/06/2009 8:07:17 PM PDT
by
madamemayhem
(defeat isn't getting knocked down, it's not getting back up)
To: whatisthetruth
“Big-leg woman, with a short short mini-skirt” -
Freddie King
30
posted on
10/06/2009 8:07:32 PM PDT
by
justapicker
(I don't want the cheese, I just want out of the trap)
To: The Good Doctor
She is apparently a real stand-out at tennis.
31
posted on
10/06/2009 8:08:05 PM PDT
by
GeronL
To: JillValentine
I pretty much was speaking for myself.
Please don’t hurt me. *ducks*
32
posted on
10/06/2009 8:13:42 PM PDT
by
wastedyears
(If I don't have a right to play defense, then I'll go on offense. - FReeper Enterprise)
To: sinanju
Anyone is capable of results. And, S. Williams as a Olympian was the most drug tested athlete on the planet during the lead up to the Olympics and during it.
The nature of her fitness allows for the creation of her muscles in the short bursts of movement. Her body would look different if she was a long distance runner.
Here is an example of sprinters. All have similar bodies as Serena, based on the interval same training as Serena.
It's a basic concept in fitness.
Like I said, amazing results.
Lolo Jones, 60 Meters Champ.
33
posted on
10/06/2009 8:13:49 PM PDT
by
BGHater
("real price of every thing ... is the toil and trouble of acquiring it")
To: Steelfish
Serena is hideous. Flat out nasty. However, her sister Venus is quite the looker.
34
posted on
10/06/2009 8:14:00 PM PDT
by
oldvike
To: Steelfish
I have a list of female tennis players I’d like to see naked. Neither of the Williams sisters is on that list.
35
posted on
10/06/2009 8:16:08 PM PDT
by
B-Chan
(Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
To: JillValentine
36
posted on
10/06/2009 8:17:31 PM PDT
by
B-Chan
(Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
To: BGHater
You have a point there. A lot has been written about the difference between sprinters and distance runners.
Now that Lolo Jones... I wouldn’t mind seeing her in the altogether.
37
posted on
10/06/2009 8:19:44 PM PDT
by
sinanju
To: Steelfish
Geeze...if she wants to make a statement she should use her mouth or her racket.It can't be about the $$$.She's got tons of that.Very sad.
To: sinanju
Lol. Lucky for you, she also is in the ESPN Body Magazine.
39
posted on
10/06/2009 8:22:16 PM PDT
by
BGHater
("real price of every thing ... is the toil and trouble of acquiring it")
To: Joiseydude
40
posted on
10/06/2009 8:24:32 PM PDT
by
databoss
(Keep The Change....)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson