Skip to comments.
Explicit Sex Returns To TV [Mainstreaming Homosexuality, Now Porn]
London Times ^
| October 06, 2009
Posted on 10/06/2009 9:34:31 AM PDT by Steelfish
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-35 last
To: isom35
Go rent “8 ½ Women” and you’ll see all of Polly you’d ever want to see. Wow.
21
posted on
10/06/2009 1:11:13 PM PDT
by
fieldmarshaldj
(~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
To: Steelfish
Who watches tv?
Why waste time?
We read out loud at our house. Much better for you. Much more entertaining.
Turn off the cable, Netflix will suffice, and so will the library.
22
posted on
10/06/2009 1:24:50 PM PDT
by
Chickensoup
(Angry about where our country is going with the current regime at the helm.)
To: Perdogg
Even more than that, HBO or Showtime. It isn't like they are even on expanded basic in the US. I was always under the impression that Europe was always a little more open with those things anyway.
Equally, the revered men who made The Wire displayed a strong preference for nude scenes featuring top-heavy young actresses.
This reminds me of the commentary for an episode on Season 2. One of the characters had a very buxom girlfriend on the show and in one episode she is topless (although not a sex scene). The two actors commentating on the episode spend a good amount of time talking about her and seem pretty sad when they realize they aren't watching that episode.
And on that note, seriously, anyone who hasn't watched The Wire should do so immediately. Nothing on TV has ever come close to being as good as it was.
23
posted on
10/06/2009 1:34:14 PM PDT
by
Mr. Blonde
(You ever thought about being weird for a living?)
To: stuartcr
Most tvs have a channel selector not far from the on/off switch. Still not sure what is so hard to understand about that one simple point...
If you don't like it... don't look. No one is forcing you.
To: isom35
I have never heard of Polly Walker but wow!:The Rome series is top notch.
25
posted on
10/06/2009 2:11:51 PM PDT
by
numberonepal
(Don't Even Think About Treading On Me)
To: Dead Corpse
The same can be said for porn in public. No one has to look, but I think most people will still agree that porn magazines should be covered up on the shelves.
Another point worth mentioning is TV broadcasts are directly subsidized by the state through the infrastructure. It’s not unreasonable to limit what we sponsor. Nobody is saying that porn should be banned, just that it should be out of the public eye, not broadcast directly after children’s shows etc.
As a guy I don’t mind porn, but when I sit down to watch Stargate Universe with my sister I would rather not find myself watching softcore porn beside her... I expect this is true of most people. So why is it wrong to complain and try to make entertainment more family friendly? There is nothing wrong with a bit of social pressure.
To: LastNorwegian
I am not sure how it is in Europe, but in the US the reason people have premium cable, is for nudity, sex, and violence premium cable has to offer.
27
posted on
10/06/2009 6:19:23 PM PDT
by
Perdogg
(Sarah Palin-Jim DeMint 2012 - Liz Cheney for Sec of State - Duncan Hunter SecDef)
To: LastNorwegian
Change the channel. Stargate is on a PAY channel. Stop paying for it. Send them a letter telling them why you are stopping your support.
Do you REALLY want the PERVERTS in most world governments setting ANY kind of moral standard into codified law?
To: Perdogg
It used to be that cable was a way to *escape* the filth fests on network TV. Not anymore.The sewer prevails almost everywhere on the electronic commode. TV:TeleVenom.
29
posted on
10/06/2009 8:32:23 PM PDT
by
liberalism is suicide
(Communism,fascism-no matter how you slice socialism, its still baloney)
To: Steelfish
The dead devil is pushing filth down the throats of earth's people and they line up with their mouths open. People shouldn't be at all shocked when they wake up in the flames of hell and it's forever, forever existing, dead, but conscious.
30
posted on
10/06/2009 11:12:18 PM PDT
by
Bellflower
(If you are left DO NOT take the mark of the beast and be damned forever.)
To: isom35; numberonepal; Steelfish
>>>I have never heard of Polly Walker but wow!:
I have it on good authority Polly Walker doodles all the day.
31
posted on
10/07/2009 2:44:12 AM PDT
by
tlb
To: IYAS9YAS
For example, ads that briefly show a pair of women’s panties.
32
posted on
10/07/2009 3:55:39 AM PDT
by
myknowledge
(F-22 Raptor: World's Largest Distributor of Sukhoi parts!)
To: liberalism is suicide; All
33
posted on
10/07/2009 4:01:33 AM PDT
by
myknowledge
(F-22 Raptor: World's Largest Distributor of Sukhoi parts!)
To: myknowledge
I see that Web site thinks an allegory for Jesus is a tool of the devil.
34
posted on
10/07/2009 5:05:50 AM PDT
by
Mr. Blonde
(You ever thought about being weird for a living?)
To: myknowledge
For example, ads that briefly show a pair of womens panties.Not so much that, not really different from the swimming pool in what's shown. No, this is things that are being shown during programs designed for young children or whole families that are very age inappropriate - male enhancement, female "problems", raunchy late-night or adult-themed shows. I mean, I'd love to sit and watch the Power Block on Spike with my nearly six-year-old son because he likes cars, and he thinks a lot of the stuff they do is cool - sometimes lame - but you have to be a "Remote Ninja" to deal with it.
35
posted on
10/07/2009 6:47:26 AM PDT
by
IYAS9YAS
(The townhalls were going great until the oPods showed up.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-35 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson