Churchill (never give up) is a more realistic solution than Galt.
>>Churchill (never give up) is a more realistic solution than Galt.<<
In a world sans the technology at the fingertips of the government, and where you are fighting an equal, I would agree. That is no longer the situation.
If our founding fathers attempted to fight a King George with the technology that is available to the current US government, Paul revere would have been nabbed before he got close to his horse. Frankly, Paul would have disappeared months before.
The whole game has changed. Sometimes you just gotta let evil reach it’s full fruition and collapse of it’s own weight, and try to be there as part of the Phoenix that rises from the ashes.
You see, in my opinion, in a democracy,the problem is not the government. It is the mass of citizens that elect that government. They will just keep electing more Maxine Waters’, Obamas, Kennedys, Kerrys, Franks’, Franken, McCains etc. And those that they elect are driving this country off a cliff, except, IMO, it is already off the cliff and in freefall. Short of sprouting wings, it is doomed to hit the bottom, and very soon.
So I have gone Galt, in pretty much every way I can.
Please interpret from the perspective of my tag line.