Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: arrogantsob
BTW nothing in the Constitution references the definition of natural born citizenship. ( arrogantsob)

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Again...If the Founding Father felt the expression “natural born” needed a definition they would have given one. The expression “natural born” must have have had a self-evident and commonly understood meaning among the citizens of the time.

Also...if every word, term, phrase, sentence, and paragraph were to be a tightly defined as you seem to wish, the Constitution would be the size of a modern Democrat Party health care bill!

93 posted on 10/02/2009 6:00:51 PM PDT by wintertime (People are not stupid! Good ideas win!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: wintertime

You keep referring to something “as I would wish” when anyone who followed the discussion would know that I was correcting the comment of another who believed that there was discussion within the Constitution of what consituted “natural-born”. I merely pointed out that was NOT the case and then you got your panties in a twist and launched off on a tangent about my “wishes”.


120 posted on 10/02/2009 8:18:11 PM PDT by arrogantsob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson