Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: arrogantsob
However, it does describe “native” as “A natural-born subject or citizen; a denizen by birth; one who owes his domicile or citizenship to the fact of his birth within the country referred to.” It then refers to U.S. vs Wong Kim Ark.

Actually, Gray misstated what common law said about Natural Born Citizens by saying every child born to aliens in England were Natural Born Subjects. Judge Gray left out the "little fact" that in common law a child born of an alien father who owed another allegiance to another power. Nothing but dicta that did not have any bearing on Wong Kim Ark who decided the case based on the 14th Amendment.

And also in the Ark decision, (Blackstone) child's born to aliens in England are Natural Born Subjects, except when the child [Denizens] is also a subject of another sovereign and who have the almost the same rights of other Natural Born Subjects BUT not to hold high office.

179 posted on 10/02/2009 11:03:09 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies ]


To: Red Steel

Your comment wrt to the Judge shows just what kind of problem we are dealing with as regards citizenship. It is that kind of imprecision which has allowed millions of anchor babies to become citizens.

There is also a problem with positing two kinds of natural-born subjects.


199 posted on 10/03/2009 11:30:05 AM PDT by arrogantsob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson