That is a lie. I responded to a comment another had made about what was in the Constitution then wintertime launched into me claiming I wanted a bunch of definitions in the Constitution. And s/he gave a long lecture on honorablity and godliness none of which I doubted or disputed. Then it degenerated into him calling me names in a cowardly fashion.
I apologize for taking the bait and blasting him in like fashion but I did not start insulting him.
As to understanding the terms used by Hawaii in order to do so the questions need to be precise and explicit and they have not been. There must be no typos or grammatical mistakes. Nor have all the discussion been limited to those questions.
You are a hijacking POS you know that.
Don’t you have something better to do on a Friday night other than bate people? Of course not. How much is Soros paying you? OK, I take the bait lets play.
First of all Native Born does not = Natural Born.
Second the 1898 Wong Ark did not settle who is a natural born citizen the case was about citizen. Nowhere in that case did the opinion of the court call Wong a Natural Born Citizen.
Third, the 14th Amendment did not settle the issue about who is a Natural Born Citizen as it pertains to the US Constitution.