To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan; rdb3; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; Salo; Bobsat; ..
2 posted on
10/01/2009 6:42:27 AM PDT by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: ShadowAce
Is this like the Taliban selling anthrax vaccines?
3 posted on
10/01/2009 6:45:35 AM PDT by
Loud Mime
(If you don't believe in God, you will believe in Government)
To: ShadowAce
4 posted on
10/01/2009 6:47:35 AM PDT by
yarddog
To: ShadowAce
I’d certainly wait for Service Pack 1 before using anything MS.
13 posted on
10/01/2009 6:52:32 AM PDT by
TangoLimaSierra
(To the left the truth looks Right-Wing.)
To: ShadowAce
Of course, no antimalware product is perfect, especially not against the latest attack programs. George Ledin, a computer science professor at Sonoma State University in California, pointed out that dozens of new malware programs appear daily, and it takes a long time to tag these new threats so the software can defeat them. By the time they put it in the catalog, it is months old, Ledin said. As a result, thousands of computers with the latest antivirus software are compromised anyway. If they need this, I guess Win7 will still be a high-vulnerability sys to viri. That's a shame, hope springs eternal . . . Still, it's a step up. And at least now Microsoft is paying some of the cost of the egregious vulnerability of the OS it sells. That still leaves the societal cost of the botnets of Windows machines, tho.
18 posted on
10/01/2009 6:56:48 AM PDT by
conservatism_IS_compassion
(SPENDING without representation is tyranny. To represent us you have to READ THE BILLS.)
To: ShadowAce
57 posted on
10/01/2009 8:27:32 AM PDT by
GOPJ
(MSM BIAS: the most grossly obvious facts can be ignored when they are unwelcome. George Orwell)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson