Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: thefactor

they should be paid in some way. or that ridiculous rule about not being able to enter the draft until 3 years removed from your last high school game should be tossed.


The 3 year rule is an NFL rule. Colleges have nothing to do with that.

I don’t disagree that there should be some type of stipend for college players for living expenses.

I think where we differ is the going pro part. The bottom line is 99% of college football players NEVER go pro, because they aren’t (and never will be) good enough to play in the pros. If they weren’t playing college footbal to pay for their college education, they’d be working somewhere (restaurant, warehouse, retail, etc...) to pay their way through college.

For the 1% of college players that go on to have a career in the NFL, that $20,000 a year scholarship isn’t a good deal. For the other 99% it is.


56 posted on 09/23/2009 12:09:07 PM PDT by Brookhaven (http://theconservativehand.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: Brookhaven
yup. it's a meritocracy. the NFL was pressured by the NCAA for this rule (likewise the NBA) because colleges were tired of their star players leaving after 1 year because their money makers were going pro.

it doesn't matter how many go pro. it should be a free market. we don't whine about kids who are auto mechanics because they didn't go to college. why should we whine about athletes who want to go pro out of high school or 1 year out of high school?

57 posted on 09/23/2009 12:18:45 PM PDT by thefactor (yes, as a matter of fact, i DID only read the excerpt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson