Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: jazusamo

So long as the bullet holes indicate the predator is facing the intended snack, things are different than if the predator was shot facing in another direction.

If the bullet holes in the predator are congruent with the snack’s statement that “I feared for my life”, then regardless of the zealotry of the AgencyPersons, any criminal case filed would have to be dismissed.

The ranchers need to find a law firm willing and able to defend such cases. Only then may the predatory beast’s intended snack defend their life as necessary without the fear of criminal law suits by one of the jack booted Scumbos or Scumbalinas in the agencies.

Any employee sending employees into a fight with a grizzly bear with less than an appropriate bear gun is risking a whopper of a law suit.

Pepper spray is a vastly inferior predator repellent than is gunpowder.

Should any ranchers be interested in setting up such a legal defense team, please FR mail me.


38 posted on 09/15/2009 3:50:38 PM PDT by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon freedom, it is essential to examine principles,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: GladesGuru

BTTT!


40 posted on 09/15/2009 4:04:07 PM PDT by jazusamo (But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson