Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Keep exploring space
Desert News ^ | 09/14/09

Posted on 09/14/2009 4:37:18 PM PDT by KevinDavis

The arguments aren't new. They echo from the '60s when some people wondered aloud whether the money being spent to visit the moon wouldn't be better spent on the nation's crumbling cities, or to help other dire problems of the day.

(Excerpt) Read more at deseretnews.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: space
Amen bro.. Amen..
1 posted on 09/14/2009 4:37:18 PM PDT by KevinDavis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide; AdvisorB; Howlin; Sparko; GeronL; Lawdoc; Carlucci; Zoe Brain; ...


For other space news go to: http://www.spacetoday.net
2 posted on 09/14/2009 4:37:49 PM PDT by KevinDavis (Can't Stop the Signal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

Pay for it yourself. I don’t drink Tang.


3 posted on 09/14/2009 4:39:13 PM PDT by tired1 (When the Devil eats you there's only one way out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
The arguments aren't new. They echo from the '60s when some people wondered aloud whether the money being spent to visit the moon wouldn't be better spent on the nation's crumbling cities, or to help other dire problems of the day.

And those problems still exist and aren't going away ever. That doesn't mean that all of mankind should be held back because of them.
4 posted on 09/14/2009 4:42:04 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Seniors, the new shovel ready project under socialized medicine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

Third World nations can’t afford space programs. When unemployment tops 20 percent, and the second wave of economic destruction gets through with us, space is going to take a budgetary hit.

But, we can still dream. Let’s go to Mars.


5 posted on 09/14/2009 4:45:52 PM PDT by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pallis
Third World nations can’t afford space programs.

And we should stop trying to afford 3rd world nations.
6 posted on 09/14/2009 4:48:36 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Seniors, the new shovel ready project under socialized medicine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

we need to explore and expand. Marxists can absorb all wealth ever created and still have poor people, crumbling cities and infrastructure.

Mankind has improved the lives of everyone as we have created technology, faced challenges, taken changes, explored the unknown. We need to figure out how to move into space.

The 2010 space elevator games are about to take place.


7 posted on 09/14/2009 4:49:41 PM PDT by rigelkentaurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

Spend the money on crumbling cities, and 35 years later we still have crumbling cities and a moribund space program.

We ought to have had a twenty-five year old space colony on the moon by now, instead we’re thinking about maybe trying to get back there sometime in the next couple of decades.

When they landed on the moon I did not doubt that by the time I was as old as I am now we’d be on Mars. What a disappointment. It took ten years from the time NASA was established until we were standing on the moon. Forty years after the moon landing we’re stuck in low earth orbit.

The next century belongs to the country that masters space travel. Our grandkids will work for their grandkids. If its us, great. If its not us, what a shame.


8 posted on 09/14/2009 4:51:27 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marron

Some 60 years from the Wright brothers first flight to a landing on the moon. 40 years later lots of robotic missions and low earth manned flight.


9 posted on 09/14/2009 5:08:08 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Seniors, the new shovel ready project under socialized medicine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

I was in favor of cutting funding when the Apollo missions showed there were no Moon Maidens on the Moon. And when the Mars Landers showed not one green-skinned alien girl, much less a planet full of them, I gave up all hope, and further space exploration in my life time was pretty much a waist of tax payer’s dollars.


10 posted on 09/14/2009 5:37:13 PM PDT by NavyCanDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tired1

FYI “Tang” wasn’t invented by NASA and flew on only one mission if I recall.

However massive amounts of spinoff technology WAS invented by NASA and helps keep our nation competetive, some of it is in your home right now. It even saves lives.

Now this is critical, so consider it carefully...

The nations that lead on the frontiers... dictate the course of human history.

let that sink and and ask if you want the free world dictating that history or not?

America was built on a pioneer culture, turn away from that, America will indeed fall away.


11 posted on 09/14/2009 5:37:46 PM PDT by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

Only the very short sighted are against space exploration.

Sadly some are a few Freepers. Always surrpises me.
That pioneer spirit is so important to our nation.
Free markets cannot always pioneer into the unknown. The profit is a different kind.

Thankfully the majority of Americans supports space exploration, and that number keeps growing.


12 posted on 09/14/2009 5:40:27 PM PDT by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
when some people wondered aloud whether the money being spent to visit the moon wouldn't be better spent on the nation's crumbling cities

Let's see...should we spend our money on keeping street bums awash in malt liquor, clean needles and crack pipes or is our money better spent exporing the heavens and developing new technologies in the process which will create new industries and lots of jobs.

I'll have to think long and hard on that and get back to you all.

13 posted on 09/14/2009 6:01:39 PM PDT by SamAdams76 (I am 5 days away from outliving Judy Garland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

NASA was funded at great expense to compete with the Soviet Empire. Clearly, there were beneficial spin-offs. There was a perceived danger from abroad.

So, OK lets fund the next 73’rd gen bomber and 54’th gen nuke sub to keep the industries going. And while we’re at it, let’s piss off the Russians so that there’s another clear threat (remember Kososvo).

Clearly, there must be foreign capital destruction for this game to do on. Let’s put nukes in Poland to keep them safe from Iran. That should work.


14 posted on 09/14/2009 6:20:01 PM PDT by tired1 (When the Devil eats you there's only one way out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: tired1
Do you use a modern computer, cell phone, wear clothes made from polyesters. etc.? Or do you live on an Amish farm?

If the first then you have benefited, if the second then you are likely not to have used anything made before 1900.

15 posted on 09/15/2009 2:58:14 AM PDT by PIF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson